- SEO Growth
- Posts
- 📢 What's Up with Google's Search Results? 📢
📢 What's Up with Google's Search Results? 📢
Where else might this be happening in the SERP...
Have you noticed something odd in Google’s search results lately? We sure have! Google ranks an utterly irrelevant site, SEO-USA.org, for several SEO-related keywords. Crazy, right?
🔍 Why is this happening? SEO-USA.org is a legitimate non-profit focusing on educational opportunities, but it has nothing to do with search engine optimisation. Yet, it's showing up for searches like "SEO program," "SEO NYC," and "SEO Awards."
Anomalies in Search Results
An anomaly is something that deviates from what’s expected. While weird search results often have explanations, what’s happening with SEO-related keywords is a true mystery.
SEO-USA.org: What’s the Deal?
SEO-USA.org stands for Sponsors for Educational Opportunity, a non-profit helping underserved youth enter colleges. It’s been around since 1963, and the site has over 20 years of history. It’s not a spam site but a well-established organisation. Yet, it’s ranking for SEO queries where it shouldn’t.
Could Backlinks Be the Reason?
Maybe. SEO-USA.org has numerous backlinks from .edu and .org sites. These high-quality links might boost its rank, but backlinks alone don’t usually explain such anomalies. Historically, links were powerful, but Google’s algorithms now weigh context and relevance more.
Why Links Probably Don’t Explain the Rankings
If backlinks were the sole reason, we’d see similar irrelevant sites ranking for SEO-related keywords, but that’s not true. Google’s algorithms have evolved to consider context and trustworthiness, diminishing the raw power of backlinks.
What’s the Answer?
Now I know what you’re thinking: this is a US website, and we’re here in Australia. But this makes me wonder, what other websites are ranking in your field that shouldn’t be? It seems a relevance factor isn’t kicking in, allowing SEO-USA.org to rank for these keywords. Maybe it’s a trustworthiness element, or perhaps something else is missing in Google’s algorithm. What do you think? Could it be a glitch or an oversight?